Lumixo vs Miro
Miro is the dominant infinite-canvas whiteboard — strong for visual collaboration, diagramming, and freeform workshops. Lumixo is purpose-built for one job: running structured brainwriting sessions that produce ranked, decision-ready output. They are not the same product. This comparison helps you pick the right tool for the job in front of you.
Try Lumixo free · See the demo
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Feature | Lumixo | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Structured brainwriting and group decisions | Open-ended visual whiteboarding |
| Session structure | Guided ideate → riff → vote → results phases | Freeform canvas; structure is up to the facilitator |
| Async-first | Yes — sessions can run for hours or weeks | Possible, but optimized for live sessions |
| Voting and prioritization | Built-in Fibonacci voting with ranked results | Voting templates available, not built into the flow |
| AI summaries and clustering | Built into every session | AI features available on higher tiers |
| Learning curve | Minutes — there's one workflow | Hours to weeks — flexibility costs onboarding time |
| Free plan | Yes — small teams run full sessions free | Yes — limited boards and editors |
When Lumixo is the better fit
- You want a repeatable ideation process your team can run without a trained facilitator.
- You need ranked, decision-ready output at the end — not a board of sticky notes to interpret later.
- Your team is distributed and needs async ideation across time zones.
- You're running brainwriting, retrospectives, or prioritization specifically.
When Miro is the better fit
- You need an open-ended visual canvas for diagramming, mapping, or design.
- Your workshops are mostly live and your facilitator wants full freedom of layout.
- You're already standardized on a whiteboarding platform across the company.